Skip to content
Northeastern University Graduate Programs Home

“AI is replacing jobs.”

You’ve undoubtedly heard such statements. And if you’re currently working or interested in a career in analytics, you may worry that the skills that at one time required human input—SQL, summarizing datasets, generating charts, and speedily creating dashboards—are now under threat.

So, is analytics still a smart field to enter?

While AI may be changing the work, it isn’t eliminating the need for analytics professionals. In many cases, AI is making skilled analysts more valuable by taking over repetitive tasks and shifting human work toward judgment, interpretation, communication, and strategy.

The work is evolving, and for people who build the right mix of technical and human skills, it can become more interesting, not less.

Key Takeaways

  • AI is changing analytics work, but it is not eliminating the need for skilled data analysts and analytics professionals.
  • As AI takes on more repetitive tasks, analysts may spend more time validating outputs, interpreting results, and guiding decisions.
  • As AI becomes more common in analytics tools, professionals who can ask better questions and interpret results well may become even more valuable.
  • The most future-ready analytics careers will combine technical fluency with data literacy, storytelling, and domain knowledge.
  • Graduate education can help professionals build the applied, human-centered, and technical skills needed to work effectively with AI.

Why is this question coming up now?

Part of the concern comes from how quickly AI has embedded itself in analytics tools. Analysts no longer have to start every workflow from a blank page. Many platforms can now help generate formulas, surface trends, build visuals, or produce a first draft of an insight summary.

As Joe Reilly, MPS in Analytics program director at Northeastern University, puts it, “A lot of the functions that were gated behind data science and analytics are now a lot more democratized.” It is easier for more people in a business to “make their own dashboard” or “write their own SQL query without being a coder by trade.”

When more people can access tools that previously required specialized knowledge, it naturally raises a fear: if more people can perform analytics tasks on their own, do companies still need analysts?

The answer, broadly, is yes, as AI tools often cannot do the full job required.

The International Labour Organization’s 2025 update on generative AI found that one in four workers globally is in an occupation with some degree of GenAI exposure, but that “most jobs will be transformed rather than made redundant” because human input is still needed to ensure accuracy and maintain ethical standards.

What AI can already do for analysts?

To understand where analytics careers are going, it helps to be specific about what AI can already do well.

AI is very good at speeding up repetitive or structured work. It can help analysts:

  • Generate starter SQL queries
  • Create first-draft dashboards
  • Summarize patterns in data
  • Clean up documentation
  • Suggest formulas or code snippets
  • Accelerate descriptive analysis

In other words, it can make the first 50% of many common tasks much faster.

These shortcuts can shorten reporting cycles, reduce time spent wrestling with syntax, and free analysts to spend more time on interpretation and recommendation.

Reilly notes that these tools are now built into many of the systems organizations already use, including Tableau, Power BI, Microsoft, and Google ecosystems.

These increased efficiencies make the field more compelling, not less. Rather than simply automating work, artificial intelligence is allowing humans to devote their attention to the areas of work that need it most.

What AI still cannot do on its own

Analytics has never only been about generating a chart or writing a query.

A good analyst asks whether the team is solving the right problem, whether the data is trustworthy, whether the method fits the question, whether the results are meaningful, and whether the recommendation is something decision-makers can actually use.

That’s where human judgment still matters.

Reilly cautions that “just because [AI] can do it doesn’t mean that you have the domain expertise to actually do it well.” He says it’s risky “just to take AI recommendations for what statistical tests should be run or what models [should] be built without having some domain knowledge there as well.”

Gail Fitzgerald, senior director of marketing, recruiting, and digital strategies for Northeastern’s Khoury College of Computer Sciences, makes a similar point from a more technical angle. She argues that effective data analysis still requires humans to manage the “translational,” “quality control,” and “validation” aspects of the work, , in addition to asking whether teams are using the right data to answer the right questions.

There are real incentives, risks, and tradeoffs that occur within analytics work in organizations. Someone still has to decide whether the data is trustworthy, whether the method fits the question, and how to explain the recommendation in a way that is credible to stakeholders.

And hiring data shows that employers continue to recognize this need. The World Economic Forum’s Future of Jobs Report 2025 says analytical thinking remains the top core skill for employers, with seven in 10 companies identifying it as essential.

How analytics roles are changing, not disappearing

As more tools can generate queries, dashboards, and summaries, the role of the analyst is becoming more strategic.

“The ultimate change is not really that these roles are going to get replaced, but they’re going to be empowered very much by these AI tools,” Reilly says.

He adds that AI should make analysts “…more able to do their ultimate job of answering business questions and figuring out how to communicate those findings to non-technical stakeholders much faster and easier.”

Fitzgerald echoes that sentiment, explaining that professionals increasingly “solve the more exciting problems.”

In basic terms, that means:

  • Deciding which questions matter most
  • Checking whether outputs are accurate and useful
  • Connecting data across systems and teams
  • Identifying business or organizational implications
  • Translating findings for nontechnical audiences

The skills that matter most in an AI-enabled analytics career

The most future-ready analysts will know how to evaluate what AI produces and turn it into sound decisions.

Reilly highlights four core skill areas that continue to matter:

  • Statistical reasoning: Knowing how to test ideas, spot patterns, and separate signal from noise
  • Technical fluency: Understanding how data moves through systems, pipelines, and tools
  • Visualization and storytelling: Explaining results clearly so stakeholders know what to do next
  • Domain knowledge: Understanding how analytics applies in fields like healthcare, finance, ecommerce, or public policy

Just as important is data literacy. Reilly emphasizes the need for professionals who “really know the data intimately,” understand quality issues, and know what the data does and does not say.

What should you consider when choosing a graduate program in analytics?

Professionals looking to acquire or refine these AI-adjacent skills and prosper as the field evolves will likely find that graduate-level education is a logical next step. But choosing which program is right for you depends on the career you desire.

At Northeastern, for instance, analytics professionals have a range of options from which to consider, based on their work’s focus and future career goals:

  • Master of Professional Studies in Analytics: For practical, business-oriented analytics work. This program is designed for students who want to collect, structure, interpret, and communicate data in organizational settings, with a strong emphasis on applied problem-solving, business intelligence, and decision-making.
  • Master of Science in Data Science: For deeper technical and predictive work. This program is better suited to students who want to work more heavily in modeling, machine learning, large-scale data systems, and the technical backbone behind data-driven products.
  • Master of Science in Data Analytics Engineering: For systems, operations, and engineering-focused analytics. This program prepares students to manage, analyze, and visualize large datasets in ways that improve products, processes, and systems across sectors like manufacturing, healthcare, logistics, and finance.
  • MS in Applied Quantitative Methods & Social Analysis: For quantitative analysis in social, policy, and public-interest contexts. This program is aimed at students who want to use data to study social systems, policy, behavior, and equity-related questions through tools like statistical analysis, computational social science, and network analysis.

Program choice matters: Each path develops a different mix of technical depth, applied analytics, systems thinking, or social-research skills.

How a graduate program can help you stay ahead of the AI shift

In a fast-changing field, the value of a graduate program is not just about learning tools. It’s about developing a deeper, practical understanding of how to use AI technology to frame problems, provide guidance, interpret results, and make smart decisions.

Reilly says the classroom can be “a safe area to explore and figure out where that boundary is” instead of learning it for the first time “in a job with live data to your boss.”

A strong graduate program can help students build that judgment through:

  • Applied projects using real datasets
  • Capstones tied to real business or organizational problems
  • Portfolio pieces that show what they can actually do
  • Exposure to faculty and coursework that stay current with industry shifts

That applied experience matters. For instance, Reilly describes Northeastern’s approach as highly practical, with students leaving with “a very rich portfolio” of designed projects.

For prospective students, this can make graduate education more than a credential. It can become a way to build evidence that they are ready to work with AI, not just read about it.

Build an analytics career that works with AI, not against it

So, are data analyst jobs going away?

Some tasks are changing. Some lower-level work may become faster, more automated, and more accessible to non-specialists. But the core need for analytics talent is not disappearing.

If anything, organizations need more people who can work effectively with AI while bringing judgment, context, and accountability to the process.

That’s why this moment can be seen as an opportunity rather than a threat.

AI is making it easier to produce outputs. It’s not making it easier to know which outputs matter, whether they are trustworthy, or what a business, institution, or team should do next. That work still belongs to people. And the people who can do it well will continue to have value.

For prospective students, the real question is, “How do I build the skills to use AI well and move into more interesting, higher-value work?”

If that’s the question you are asking, Northeastern’s analytics portfolio offers multiple ways to prepare for a field that is changing quickly but still growing in importance.

Want to learn more?

Related articles